Elliot Temple:
i want some philosophers to follow on twitter – or elsewhere
there's like constant stream of politics news and ideas and things to read and comment on
but not for philosophy
Justin Mallone:
curi42 pretty gud, dunno of any others
Elliot Temple:
they don't have to be like perfect at all
like the politics ppl aren't perfect
and the articles that get linked often less so
i tried to follow some Oists b4
but it was like uhh bad
like less interesting than Daniel Horowitz
or Daniel Greenfield
or Caroline Glick
i remember a claim that a lot of the reason for lack of Oist discussion groups on web is they are on facebook
but i couldn't find any decent ones there
that Evan liar bro claimed there's lots of good private ones
i think he has low standards
https://www.reddit.com/r/Objectivism/comments/3h6hrr/best_objectivists_on_twitter/?
Justin Mallone:
peak quality on even best secret galt’s gulch FB forum is probably like 5% of quality of mediocre FI thread
Elliot Temple:
https://twitter.com/mdobjectivists <-- too shit to follow
https://twitter.com/canobjectivist?lang=en <-- google found me a bro who last tweeted jan 2012
Justin Mallone:
MD group looks maybe better than DC one
Elliot Temple:
google top hit was https://twitter.com/daniellemorrill/lists/objectivists <-- PAGE DOESN'T EXIST
> Wallace Runnymede ?@W_Runnymede 27 Dec 2015
Are you surprised #individualism has a bad name, when it's been co-opted by #AustrianSchool & #Objectivists? Don't let them get away with it
#Objectivists hashtag not meeting my expectations
Justin Mallone:
lol
Elliot Temple:
oh and note that's last year. only one result for this year for that hashtag
> Emanuel Rutten ?@emanuelrutten 17 Dec 2015
A majority of professional philosophers identify themselves as moral #objectivists, rejecting moral subjectivism. (Bourguet & Chalmers 2013)
^ wrong objectivism >>
> a dynamic psychological self-defense weapon TO PROTECT YOU FROM IRRATIONALLY SELFISH PEOPLE
wtf i click anti-love article from some twitter Oist and get a libertarian site attacking selfishness as irrational
:(((((
Justin Mallone:
odd
hey u could reply to my ITOE posts
:D
Elliot Temple:
> Some happily discover fulfilling relationships. The rationally selfish individual cherishes value for value relationships—and this includes love. So you know rewarding love relationships do exist. Unfortunately, the lonely and scorned cry out “Oh love, sweet love, why have you forsaken me?” During the darkness of an endless night, reeling from love’s forgetfulness, staring sightlessly at the ceiling, their swollen eyes blurred by endless tears, they wonder in their immense suffering how long Mr. Heartache will remain an unwelcome guest.
Robert Meyer ?@robertmeyer9 15m15 minutes ago
#Socialism is a faulty, decadent theory from top to bottom, violating the #LawsOfEconomics and human decency.
decadent not the word i would have chosen
Robert Meyer ?@robertmeyer9 21m21 minutes ago
Libertarian Warrior Challenges the Absolute Moralist – Chapter 1 – The Battlefield http://dld.bz/d2qnP #Liberty #Freedom #Oppression
what kind of Oist calls himself a libertarian warrior?
Justin Mallone:
a deeply confused one?
Elliot Temple:
his bio
Robert Meyer
@robertmeyer9
My CONQUERING LIFE'S ILLUSIONS book supplies you arsenal of dynamic weapons to conquer irrationally selfish/ self-defeating behavior http://thedynamicweapons.com
> I hope that out of the ashes of despair a philosophy of hope, honesty and accomplishment arises.
You may ask “What philosophy is this?”
It is an integrated philosophy extolling the virtues of self-reliance and unhampered capitalism. It’s the Way of The Libertarian Warrior. Since these virtues put into practice result in unheard of prosperity and abundance, people will find it much easier to achieve the Zen State of Mind. In addition, something wondrous also occurs.
You ready? You’ll love this. Because more individuals soar to a higher level of awareness, a spiritual and intellectual revolution eventually ushers in a New Age of Enlightenment.
Justin Mallone:
i skimmed ur paste, looks like trash
i saw a reference to Zen
didn’t look promising
Elliot Temple:
i pretty sure it is promising things
Justin Mallone:
lol
Elliot Temple:
like zenness and that you'll love what he's selling
Laurie Rice
@LaurieRice_
Writer @theatlassociety, Exec Alum @sfliberty. #Libertarian, #Objectivism, #feminism. Likes #AynRand, pop culture, #ReproFreedom, tech, #bitcoin, pretty things.
lol @ kelley society ppl
Justin Mallone:
ayn rand fan club
Elliot Temple:
http://nextobjectivists.blogspot.com
latest post, dec 2014:
begins:
> The workshop has been on hiatus, but while we wait for momentum to seize us again, here are three events in the next few days that feature work by members of the workshop & are guaranteed to be of interest. I hope to see you there!
Justin Mallone:
momentum to seize us again eh
don’t sound like prime movers to me
Elliot Temple:
turns out waiting for external motor to "seize" you can be a long wait
Justin Mallone:
heh
Elliot Temple:
> Ayn Rand opened up her thought provoking book The Virtue of Selfishness, a primer on Objectivist ethics, with a question people sometimes asked her. Why do you use the word selfishness to denote virtuous qualities of character, when the word antagonizes so many people to whom it does not mean the things you mean?
She said for the reason that makes you afraid of it, which is obviously a bold statement. Unfortunately, her bold statement could lead to some confusion. We need to understand that she was referring to rational selfishness, not the irrationality people normally associate with selfishness.
Justin Mallone:
people definitely associate some stuff that’s good with selfishness
Elliot Temple:
i find this weird cuz Rand did explain this in the chapter
he just does a super brief tl;dr of Rand, then gives his own much worse version of what she already wrote
Justin Mallone:
lol
Elliot Temple:
he's like "Rand was obviously bold, but some ppl confused. let me fix that..."
no, she wasn't going for boldness in particular, and she explained it
she's literally all like
"but for the better bros lemme explain more"
> Let’s put Objectivism and spiritual beliefs into perspective. You can accept most of Rand’s political, economic and philosophical beliefs and still practice a spiritual discipline. Acting as if she possessed godly powers and thinking you have to either accept Objectivism 100% or reject it is unrealistic.
OH JFC
OK I"M OUT
DONE
see this is what happens when you go look for some philosophy comments to read
u r hoping for like random breitbart contributor quality
u don't get it
Justin Mallone:
lol
Elliot Temple:
:((((
Messages (4)
The only living philosopher I can think of is Umberto Eco. I think I mentioned him before. He's known because he wrote a fiction book that became a Hollywood film. *hint, hint*
I don't think you will like him, though. His website opening quote is pretty bad. He seems to be more of a poet than a philosopher from his tweets. Vague and etc.
He added plenty of other self-proclaimed philosophers, maybe worth researching?
http://www.umbertoeco.com/en/umberto-eco-quotes.html
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth."
he's anti the search for truth.
you haven't stated any good ideas he has, any good signs, any value.
Yeah, he seems to be bad. I liked some of his essays in his older books. I didn't say he was good. He said he was alive.
I think umber to eco's claim can be more charitably read. Often people mistake the search for absolute truth with the search for essences. The distinction, especcialy outside of people who are familiar with popper, is not often seen.
Popper also though that the riddle existed, and that there was no essential explanation for the world. I think umber to Eco is teying to say something similar. I do not think he would deny truth, but something like an ultimate explanation of the world without remainder.