Okie, so I managed to write and then erase comments on McCarthy speech. So, take 2.... v_v At least itll be better this time.
Speech of Joseph McCarthy, Wheeling, West Virginia, February 9, 1950
This speech seems to be McCarthys most famous, but not positive. All the bold spots are my emphasis.
Ladies and gentlemen, tonight as we celebrate the one hundred forty-first birthday of one of the greatest men in American history, I would like to be able to talk about what a glorious day today is in the history of the world. As we celebrate the birth of this man who with his whole heart and soul hated war, I would like to be able to speak of peace in our timeof war being outlawedand of world-wide disarmament. These would be truly appropriate things to be able to mention as we celebrate the birthday of Abraham Lincoln.
McCarthys reputation is, in short, horribly evil. Ive heard he was quite bad with specific factual claims, but that some of his general points were mostly true. And Ive heard that his recklessness was more harmful than helpful to the anti-commie movement. Like people could just brush off true accusations as McCarthyism. Anyway, his speech doesnt start like a raving loon. Onward!
Five years after a world war has been won, mens hearts should anticipate a long peaceand mens minds should be free from the heavy weight that comes with war. But this is not such a periodfor this is not a period of peace. This is a time of the cold war. This is a time when all the world is split into two vast, increasingly hostile armed campsa time of a great armament race.
Today we can almost physically hear the mutterings and rumblings of an invigorated god of war. You can see it, feel it, and hear it all the way from the Indochina hills, from the shores of Formosa, right over into the very heart of Europe itself.
McCarthy does not like complacency.
The one encouraging thing is that the mad moment has not yet arrived for the firing of the gun or the exploding of the bomb which will set civilization about the final task of destroying itself. There is still a hope for peace if we finally decide that no longer can we safely blind our eyes and close our ears to those facts which are shaping up more and more clearly . . . and that is that we are now engaged in a show-down fight . . . not the usual war between nations for land areas or other material gains, but a war between two diametrically opposed ideologies.
This part starts a little apocalyptic, but that does not recur, and is in fact immediately contradicted. McCarthy is still against complacency, and is now bringing up his next point.
The great difference between our western Christian world and the atheistic Communist world is not political, gentlemen, it is moral. For instance, the Marxian idea of confiscating the land and factories and running the entire economy as a single enterprise is momentous. Likewise, Lenins invention of the one-party police state as a way to make Marxs idea work is hardly less momentous.
Absolutely superb! When reading the speech, be sure to swap the words God and Christian with morality and atheism with immoral. Thats what he really means. If you disagree, three points
- If you dont swap, my comments will make no sense.
- Ill write on the subject later.
- If you do swap, and you find that with the swap, the speech makes more sense than otherwise -- if you find the swap has a lot of explanatory power -- then you will have good reason to think it true.
By the way, Im most definitely an atheist.
Stalins resolute putting across of these two ideas, of course, did much to divide the world. With only these differences, however, the east and the west could most certainly still live in peace.
This bit is rather moderate. Onward!
The real, basic difference, however, lies in the religion of immoralism . . . invented by Marx, preached feverishly by Lenin, and carried to unimaginable extremes by Stalin. This religion of immoralism, if the Red half of the world triumphsand well it may, gentlementhis religion of immoralism will more deeply wound and damage mankind than any conceivable economic or political system.
Well, we can see why a lot of people would hate McCarthy. But I rather like this part.
Karl Marx dismissed God as a hoax, and Lenin and Stalin have added in clear-cut, unmistakable language their resolve that no nation, no people who believe in a god, can exist side by side with their communistic state.
Swap God with morality and reread the paragraph.
Karl Marx, for example, expelled people from his Communist Party for mentioning such things as love, justice, humanity or morality. He called this soulful ravings and sloppy sentimentality. . . .
Wow! Fuck Marx.
Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity. The modern champions of communism have selected this as the time, and ladies and gentlemen, the chips are downthey are truly down.
What comes to mind, is that in the present, a lot of people want to kill us. They say so. Saddam is not shy about it -- America is his enemy. Every friday, all over the Islamic world, Muslim holy men preach death to the Jews and Christians. Every day, are numerous attempted terror attacks in Israel. Iraqis even shoot at US citizens. They shoot guns at us. (No disrespect to Israel, which has put up with this for its entire history, intended. They shoot at you too, I know.)
And yet, people put their hand in the sand, and say that three months ago we lived in peace, and if only the US would stop playing the aggressor, and if only the damn Jews would stop whining and die, then everything would be fine and dandy. Some people think the chips are not down, there is no battle, nothing at all to worry about.
And today, these people are dead wrong. Thus far, Ive every reason to think that they were dead wrong in McCarthys time too.
Lest there be any doubt that the time has been chosen, let us go directly to the leader of communism todayJoseph Stalin. Here is what he saidnot back in 1928, not before the war, not during the warbut 2 years after the last war was ended: To think that the Communist revolution can be carried out peacefully, within the framework of a Christian democracy, means one has either gone out of ones mind and lost all normal understanding, or has grossly and openly repudiated the Communist revolution. . . .
Thats pretty convincing, isnt it? Stalin wanted us dead. McCarthy wanted to listen to him -- to take him at face value.
Ladies and gentlemen, can there be anyone tonight who is so blind as to say that the war is not on? Can there by anyone who fails to realize that the Communist world has said the time is now? . . . that this is the time for the show-down between the democratic Christian world and the communistic atheistic world?
Unless we face this fact, we shall pay the price that must be paid by those who wait too long.
I want to point out that, thus far, McCarthy seems to be a good speaker with good points, not a man deserving hatred.
Six years ago, . . . there was within the Soviet orbit, 180,000,000 people. Lined up on the antitotalitarian side there were in the world at that time, roughly 1,625,000,000 people. Today, only six years later, there are 80,000,000,000 people under the absolute domination of Soviet Russiaan increase of over 400 percent. On our side, the figure has shrunk to around 500,000. In other words, in less than six years, the odds have changed from 9 to 1 in our favor to 8 to 1 against us.
I dont trust these numbers at all. The 80 billion must be a typo. But still, dont trust the rest. I also dont care much whether he got these numbers right. It doesnt seem important.
This indicates the swiftness of the tempo of Communist victories and American defeats in the cold war. As one of our outstanding historical figures once said, When a great democracy is destroyed, it will not be from enemies from without, but rather because of enemies from within. . . .
McCarthy reveals another of his points: he is upset with anti-Americanism inside America.
The reason why we find ourselves in a position of impotency is not because our only powerful potential enemy has sent men to invade our shores . . . but rather because of the traitorous actions of those who have been treated so well by this Nation. It has not been the less fortunate, or members of minority groups who have been traitorous to this Nation, but rather those who have had all the benefits that the wealthiest Nation on earth has had to offer . . . the finest homes, the finest college education and the finest jobs in government we can give.
Today too, the colleges are full of idiotarians. The working class, far as I know, is much better grounded in reality.
This is glaringly true in the State Department. There the bright young men who are born with silver spoons in their mouths are the ones who have been most traitorous. . . .
I hear the State Department is full of idiotarians today. Seems reasonable to suppose it was in 1950, too.
I have here in my hand a list of 205 . . . a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department. . . .
I dont trust his list one bit. Pretty sure it was never revealed. Seems like, in retrospect, a big mistake on McCarthys part. Must do more research.
As you know, very recently the Secretary of State proclaimed his loyalty to a man guilty of what has always been considered as the most abominable of all crimesbeing a traitor to the people who gave him a position of great trusthigh treason. . . .
Wow! I wonder if this is true. Must do more research.
He has lighted the spark which is resulting in a moral uprising and will end only when the whole sorry mess of twisted, warped thinkers are swept from the national scene so that we may have a new birth of honesty and decency in government.
Heroic sentiments, arent they? He wants to fight to get idiotarians out of government. Or so it sounds. Dont actually know how many idiotarians there were in 1950. Have heard plenty, but must do more research.
So, to sum up, McCarthy was pro-morality (and Christianity), anti-commie, anti-complacency, didnt like anti-Americanism at home, and had some suspect facts. And was blunt. So far...I like him.
Update (dec 15, 2003): My blog has moved. It is now found here.