N

http://www.harveycartel.org/metanet/downloads.html

ninja game. 2d platformer. controls are left/right/jump. fun.

there's 500 levels. they are in sections of 5. i beat sections 0, 1, and 90. so you can skip ahead once you get the idea i guess. i died a lot. it doesn't matter. you can just retry and the gameplay is fast. you have a time limit (90 seconds i think). if you are too slow you should suicide without beating the level b/c your time limit lasts for all 5 levels in a section, but dying resets you to the time you started the level with. you can gather gold to get more time. also it's not immediately obvious but you win by going out the door. the door is closed. hit the blue switch.

press against walls when falling to slide on them. you can jump off. you can go straight up a wall if you jump enough but it's slow -- going back and forth is much easier. hold jump longer to jump further. it takes some practice to aim jumps to actually land on the platform you want. it's easy to go too far or too short. run before jumping to gain more speed.

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

Humans

BBC Earth: "The lives of these elephants is dominated by wet and dry, the seasonal cycle created by the sun."

Me: Yes, indeed. Most of the Earth is dominated by the sun. And some other facts of happenstance like how much carbon, water, and nitrogen there is here. But there is one major exception: human beings. The role that the sun -- and those other facts -- plays in our lives is dwindling as we gain more control over our environment. We now have electric lights, sun screen, air conditioning, roofs, and so on. We can go outside when it's very hot, or very cold. We are becoming ever less parochial. Elephants are not.


Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

TV

(Bad) TV is no danger to people with strong critical faculties.

Of the rest, there is no use barring them from TV. Thwarting them will alienate them. And mistaken ideas are very easy to come by; they will find plenty elsewhere.

The only way keeping TV away could conceivably work is if the person was in constant contact with only good ideas, and accepted those uncritically. But in that case, if they are listening to good ideas all the time, why not just teach them to think critically?

BTW I actually think a lot of mainstream TV is quite good, and that TV has been getting better and more intelligent over time.

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

RSS Feed

I added an RSS feed. If there is a problem with it (or any other bug) tell me and I will fix it.

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (3)

Real Wages Declining?

http://www.lraonline.org/charts.php?id=8

Chart shows real wages going down.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
in real life, we are a hell of a lot richer than we used to be. you can work at McDonalds and buy a computer now that is far better than computers only the very rich could afford 30 years ago.

hmm, so how do they do it? (make the statistics lie so much)

well first of all they divide the number of jobs by the total amount paid out in a week. if you get a part time job b/c your parents are rich and give u half ur money, you just lowered the "real wages" per week! all the college students with part time jobs are lowering "real wages". they (bureau of labor statistics) even say their real wages statistic is a lot lower than the real wages for full time workers.

worse, if you get 2 half-time jobs, then you have added 2 to the job count, so you lower real wages compared to having one full time job. yes, it's that stupid. "real wages are going down" could mean "ppl have more jobs for less hours"

next, if ppl work less hours per week (b/c they are rich enough they don't have to) then the "real wages" go down. that's another way the numbers come out dead wrong.

and next they tie these real wages to the consumer price index (CPI-W). this is supposed to measure how much people have to pay for the same basket of goods. so essentially it takes inflation into account.

what's wrong with the CPI-W? well to start with, it takes into account sales tax. if sales tax goes up, "real wages" go down. there is a sort of logic to that, but that's nothing to do with how productive we are. and it doesn't take into account income tax though, for some reason, so that seems inconsistent.

all this stuff so far probably isn't nearly bad enough to get real wages to appear to go down. so what else did they do?

the idea of the CPI-W is to figure out how much it costs to buy a basket of representative goods. they represent the cost of living. so it has food, rent, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Consumer_Price_Index
Because people's buying habits had changed substantially, a new study was made covering expenditures in the years 1934-1936, which provided the basis for a comprehensively revised index introduced in 1940. During World War II, when many commodities were scarce and goods were rationed, the index weights were adjusted temporarily to reflect these shortages. In 1951, the BLS again made interim adjustments, based on surveys of consumer expenditures in seven cities between 1947 and 1949, to reflect the most important effects of immediate postwar changes in buying patterns. The index was again revised in 1953 and 1964.

In 1978, the index was revised to reflect the spending patterns based upon the surveys of consumer expenditures conducted in 1972-1974.
wait? they changed what"s in the basket. if ppl start buying stuff that is more valuable, they put that in the basket and call that the new cost of living. it's the cost of living a new and richer life style. so saying that real wages decreased when you update the "cost of living" to include a richer life style is totally missing the point. it's a bit like saying people keep spending the same proportion of their money, and therefore life isn't cheaper.

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (2)

Comments

Comments added. I'm notified of them by email so feel free to comment on old posts. Accounts to come. HTML in comments to come. Spam solution to come if I get spam.

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (0)

Godwin on Marriage

William Godwin writes in Enquiry Concerning Political Justice:
The evil of marriage, as it is practiced in European countries, extends further than we have yet described. The method is, for a thoughtless and romantic youth of each sex, to come together, to see each other, for a few times, and under circumstances full of delusion, and then to vow to eternal attachment. What is the consequence of this? In almost every instance they find themselves deceived. They are reduced to make the best of an irretrievable mistake. They are led to conceive it is their wisest policy, to shut their eyes upon realities, happy, if, by any perversion of intellect, they can persuade themselves that they were right in their first crude opinion of each other. Thus the institution of marriage is made a system of fraud; and men who carefully mislead their judgments in the daily affair of their life, must be expected to have a crippled judgment in every other concern.

Add to this, that marriage, as now understood, is a monopoly, and the worst of monopolies. So long as two human beings are forbidden, by positive institution, to follow the dictates of their own mind, prejudice will be alive and vigorous. So long as I seek, by despotic and artificial means, to maintain my possession of a woman, I am guilty of the most odious selfishness. Over this imaginary prize, men watch with perpetual jealousy; and one man finds his desire, and his capacity to circumvent, as much excited, as the other is excited, to traverse his projects, and frustrate his hopes. As long as this state of society continues, philanthropy will be crossed and checked in a thousand ways, and the still augmenting stream of abuse will continue to flow.

The abolition of the present system of marriage, appears to involve no evils.
You can read the book online here. The quote comes from this chapter.

Elliot Temple | Permalink | Messages (2)